<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stock Photography: The oddest things sell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nicklewis.net/2010/01/17/stock-photography-the-oddest-things-sell/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nicklewis.net/2010/01/17/stock-photography-the-oddest-things-sell/</link>
	<description>Freelance Web Developer and Photographer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:35:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.nicklewis.net/2010/01/17/stock-photography-the-oddest-things-sell/comment-page-1/#comment-2410</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 03:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nicklewis.net/?p=3373#comment-2410</guid>
		<description>Hi Nick,

Good post. I agree it is interesting and often surprising what sells on Alamy. I&#039;m sure most stock photographers are often bewildered that what they consider their best shots never sell while mundane images do well. If you can imagine a possible use for an image then it stands a chance of making a sale!

Alex</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nick,</p>
<p>Good post. I agree it is interesting and often surprising what sells on Alamy. I&#8217;m sure most stock photographers are often bewildered that what they consider their best shots never sell while mundane images do well. If you can imagine a possible use for an image then it stands a chance of making a sale!</p>
<p>Alex</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NickL</title>
		<link>http://www.nicklewis.net/2010/01/17/stock-photography-the-oddest-things-sell/comment-page-1/#comment-2395</link>
		<dc:creator>NickL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 21:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nicklewis.net/?p=3373#comment-2395</guid>
		<description>Thanks John. I also supply images to UPPA (part of www.photoshot.com) and used to shoot for Filmmagic who became part of Getty - Hence I used to shoot for them, as Getty really are too big for their own good..... now that may fire off some interesting discussion!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks John. I also supply images to UPPA (part of <a href="http://www.photoshot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.photoshot.com</a>) and used to shoot for Filmmagic who became part of Getty &#8211; Hence I used to shoot for them, as Getty really are too big for their own good&#8230;.. now that may fire off some interesting discussion!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Rocha</title>
		<link>http://www.nicklewis.net/2010/01/17/stock-photography-the-oddest-things-sell/comment-page-1/#comment-2392</link>
		<dc:creator>John Rocha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nicklewis.net/?p=3373#comment-2392</guid>
		<description>Hi Nick

As a fellow Alamy photographer I&#039;ve noticed similar things. I suppose that somewhere there&#039;s a market for anything if the technnical standard is high enough and of course Alamy edits only technical quality while ignoring subject matter. I also contribute to more conventional agencies such as Footprint where there is an editing process. This is also problematical as I have little idea what is acceptable or not. The fact is that there are are lots of good photographers who can take beatiful shots but many of the most mundane subjects are in short supply. My attitude is a bit like this: I love photography and want to always be a better, a greater photographer but I realise that lots of people buying stock may have little interest in great photography and just concentrate on the subject matter. Stock is hard these days - so all the best

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nick</p>
<p>As a fellow Alamy photographer I&#8217;ve noticed similar things. I suppose that somewhere there&#8217;s a market for anything if the technnical standard is high enough and of course Alamy edits only technical quality while ignoring subject matter. I also contribute to more conventional agencies such as Footprint where there is an editing process. This is also problematical as I have little idea what is acceptable or not. The fact is that there are are lots of good photographers who can take beatiful shots but many of the most mundane subjects are in short supply. My attitude is a bit like this: I love photography and want to always be a better, a greater photographer but I realise that lots of people buying stock may have little interest in great photography and just concentrate on the subject matter. Stock is hard these days &#8211; so all the best</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NickL</title>
		<link>http://www.nicklewis.net/2010/01/17/stock-photography-the-oddest-things-sell/comment-page-1/#comment-2388</link>
		<dc:creator>NickL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 23:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nicklewis.net/?p=3373#comment-2388</guid>
		<description>Hi David - I can recall you saying something a little while back about editorial photography versus the more fine-art style of shot. I really do feel that many people overlook the opportunities to make more sales in favour of what appeals to them rather than the marketplace. We all fall into this trap, I sure do!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David &#8211; I can recall you saying something a little while back about editorial photography versus the more fine-art style of shot. I really do feel that many people overlook the opportunities to make more sales in favour of what appeals to them rather than the marketplace. We all fall into this trap, I sure do!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.nicklewis.net/2010/01/17/stock-photography-the-oddest-things-sell/comment-page-1/#comment-2387</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 22:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nicklewis.net/?p=3373#comment-2387</guid>
		<description>Sounds good!

I&#039;m sure it&#039;s that you have developed an eye for what people want, and more power to you.

All the best,

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds good!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s that you have developed an eye for what people want, and more power to you.</p>
<p>All the best,</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

